About Berger's comment: It takes energy to change the state of a satellite, i.e., destroy it. Berger would have us believe that each satellite that consumes energy will lower the amount falling upon other satellites, as if satellites are energy sponges denying neighboring satellites the same level the satellite seeing their demise are experiencing. But if there's energy in that broad storm to knock out one satellite, why won't all be knocked out? Oh. Fiction. ✔️
love this show!
About Berger's comment: It takes energy to change the state of a satellite, i.e., destroy it. Berger would have us believe that each satellite that consumes energy will lower the amount falling upon other satellites, as if satellites are energy sponges denying neighboring satellites the same level the satellite seeing their demise are experiencing. But if there's energy in that broad storm to knock out one satellite, why won't all be knocked out? Oh. Fiction. ✔️